Accepting Your Quantum Self

Have you ever stopped and taken the time to look back at all the forks in the road your life has taken? Not just the big choices but the choices which took you on a different path? Recently I’ve reflected on some of these choices in my life and some new and interesting thoughts occurred. Although this is not the first time I’ve thought about the different paths my life could have taken, it is the first I really reflected on the fallacy of a unified self.

When most people look back at our decisions, we lie to ourselves and say “I would still be the same person”. But how can this be? Small decisions our parents made create the foundation for our lives. Where we live, where we go to school, do we attend church or not, who our friends are, down to our taste in music, clothes and food, are all influenced by our parents. Once we begin to make our own decisions, small things to large change the path of our lives irreversibly. Any number of decisions can change where you go to college (or if you go), where you live, who you date, who you choose to spend your life with, having children, etc, etc.

Can we so easily say I would still be the same person even if I lived in a different city, had a different significant other, had a different career path, bosses, or children? The reality is, we are the sum of all decisions and uncontrolled circumstances we have made throughout our lives. Good or bad these decisions have created the current self we know and recognize. Unfortunately, once we overcome the fallacy of a unified self and accept the more quantum view of personal reality, it is all to easy to dwell on our past choices and mistakes. Or try to solely blame our environment growing up and our lives circumstances for our current failings and unhappy environment.

It is important we not overlook the intangible and uncontrolled aspects of our lives that intertwine with our decisions. These have a large influence on the opportunities and choices presented to us during the course of our lives. Yet, those aspects of our lives such as bad schooling, poor nutrition growing up, bad parents etc, are not the end sum of our humanity. In the end, we have to accept responsibility for the decisions we’ve made and will make, and understand we have no control over many portions of life and reality. We cannot change the decisions our parents made or the environment we grew up in, but we can change ourselves and our decisions. Only by learning from past mistakes and successes, not dwelling on who we could’ve or should’ve been, and accepting who we are now, can we overcome our current set of circumstances.

It is my perspective a key part of our human existence is trying to make the most of each day and each choice we make, while also trying to guarantee our human brothers and sisters are provided ample opportunity to make the most of their lives. We grow as individuals by seeking out better life opportunities, not just for ourselves but for those around us. Especially those who are coming from more trying personal realities and are presented with less savory choices to make based on their environments. It is in this way we grow as people and a society. Here’s to my 39th year on the planet, I plan to make the most of each choice that comes my way and hope you can do the same!

To Filterpret

Here is a great article in the Scientific American talking about what  the mind “let’s” you see. While they use terms like “hidden censor”, “selective selectivity” and “unconscious selective attention”, what they are discussing is really no different from “filterpret”. This is a must read for anyone that enjoys studying the mind and how we process the world around us. Overall I am highly satisfied with how this subject was covered by the author Keith Payne. I do, however, have two specific points to pick on that I believe where missed opportunities.

First, it’s been shown through many studies that people from different cultures see (concentrate on) different things in the same picture. One of the most famous being this study also covered here in Nat Geo. Effectively, your cultural upbringing creates unseen and unknown rules for how and what you are supposed to identify when you look at situations around you. Richard Nisbett even wrote a book “The Geography of Thought” exploring this topic in some detail. The article in question today makes no mention of these cultural differences in the “hidden censor”. I think this is a shame as it would have added to the overall discussion he is clearly trying to create with this article.

Second, I disagree with the “problem” identifies at the end of his article. To quote:

“Personal contact between people of different races has always been seen as a powerful way to reduce prejudice. As the world becomes increasingly multicultural and globalized, these unconscious blinders might make us immune to that diversity. We cannot get to know or learn from people if we look right through them. The modern world might magnify these effects in a second way, because the power of the unconscious is greatest when our attention is under the heaviest demands. In today’s multitasking world, when we split our attention between Facebook and real friends, between our kindles and our kids, between our laptops and our loved ones, we delegate ever more to the unconscious. It makes you wonder who you have looked at today and have not seen.”

What we hear our parents say, what we see on TV and who we see our parents hang out with create some of this “hidden censor”. While I agree with the statement “We cannot get to know or learn from people if we look right through them”, only through constant vigilance and work can we create an environment where kids don’t grow up racist and sexist. His and others research only strengthens the need to clean up the way in which we portray people on TV and try to improve the way in which we view those “different from us. In the end we are all human and need to remember that.

Missing the Point

I will be writing string of articles here at filterpret and some of my other writing venues about education in China. Today’s short input is about parent’s missing the forest for the trees. This article at IB Times discusses early childhood education classes in China focused on teaching MBA style skills. Instead of seeing these classes as part of a larger picture to help children become ready to thrive and excel in the 21st century, notice how these classes are sold to help kids more than a decade away from college be better prepared to conquer the skills needed for college entrance exams. China’s education system is already horribly broken and instead of making changes the CCP and parents seem more than prepared to double down on what is clearly not working. Can anyway tell me the definition of insanity again…..

All in One… almost

The article I read today has all my favorite topics in one place, all except China. It is an interview on Salon.com with the journalist Daniel Bergner who has a book coming out about female sexuality. Daniel wrote the provocative article in the NY Tines in 2009 first exploring this topic. For those interested in reading the original article I suggest you also read the comments section here. As I read all of these this morning, I was flooded with so many thoughts and tangential ideas, I almost didn’t know where to start. Luckily, I had all day to think about it, and here is what struck me the most.

1) Asking the question what women want is the wrong question! Any scientist or journalist who starts from this point is going to have some seriously filterpreted data and outcomes. We must recognize at the inception that our very personal upbringing and background answer this question as much as any other component.

2) Is it really all that shocking to discover that we have been twisting and distorting women’s sexuality both in science and society? How many cultures have in the past, or currently, placed blame for all sexual acts at women’s feet? The fear of a free and unconstrained female gender runs throughout the vast majority of the history of the world in the last 3000 years.

3) Can some of these scientists be more disconnected from reality? Of course the mind and body are separate! Of course the mind and body are connected! Take some time and read the literature from fields besides your own, and some of your questions may already have been answered. I am more interested in finding out the how and why of when we as humans can override the body and when it seems inevitable why we must give in.

4) I wish we could get our journalists, and society, to stop dealing in such either or terms. Not all people are the same, not all men, not all women, so what we “want” and what we find arousing is going to be different. I am fairly confident that removing all barriers to the female gender, many will still choose to be monogamous. Ditto for men. Making sweeping generalizations demeans both genders!

5) Reading articles like this only strengthen my resolve to work towards a future where a person can be just that, a person. Not a woman first, or a man first, or a religion first or a skin color first, or a sexual orientation first, JUST A PERSON.

My Real Concern in China

I had a large post all written up about the 15-year-old that defaced a cultural icon in Egypt’s Luxor. Instead, I have decided to concentrate on a broader picture of what ails China. The issue I see is not with one person or any one event; it lies with looking at the sum of events through the prism of cultural and historical understanding.

This piece in CDT is great starting point, as it does a fine job aggregating comments on the People’s Daily series about “Dishonest Americans”. As foreigners we shouldn’t be angry about such “news”, we should applaud them. In general, these types of articles are a fundamental part of what we consider freedom of the press. It isn’t the fact there are articles pointing out the “bad” side of Americans that is of concern, it’s the fact these types of articles almost never reflect a counterpoint. Even more concerning is  the reality that these types of stories are not allowed when they expose the “bad” size of China, the Chinese people and especially the Chinese government. The Ministry of Truth Section of CDT is as far as one needs to go to see this in action. The latest directive is to limit coverage of child sexual abuse!  Having several friends who work in journalism in China, I know first hand the validity of these directives aimed at maintaining ”social cohesion”.

Even when we do get shows or articles exposing official malfeasance, we (both foreigners and the Chinese populace) cannot trust the authenticity of such pieces.  A great example is this TV show in Wuhan (here and here). On the surface it seems perfect, yet knowing how controlled the state media is in China, how can we know the whole thing is not scripted? Are programs like this a genuine attempt to become more transparent and involve citizens in fixing government malfeasance Or are these types of programs essentially a feint to distract from the lack of real reform?

Returning to our young Chinese vandal in Luxor, we all recognize what he did was stupid and offensive. Yet can, or should we, blame a whole nation for a spoiled and ignorant 15-year-old? My answer is no. Yet what would have happened if a foreign 15-year-old did something proportionally stupid in China? It would not be a far stretch to say it would be made out as a slander against China’s National honor and a purposeful affront to Chinese culture.

Would this be because most Chinese feel this way? Or because the State sees a benefit in villainizing foreigners and taking it from the individual to the national level? Many Chinese recognize news reports like “Dishonest Americans” for the distractions they are. Unfortunately, as is true in any society, there are to many who swallow these claims whole. For China to grow and tackle the massive issues facing their society, there must be a complete change in how the people and the government interact. The people need to feel their government listens to their views, that their views appropriately represented by the media and that they are not told constantly what to think and when. Only through these changes can China’s citizens begin to trust the government again. A great place to start is by ending the constant flow of national, even jingoistic, rhetoric.

Knowledge with No Background

This last week nothing really caught my eye to write about on filterpret. Between being slightly more introspective than normal and being extra busy no news or ideas set of the chain of thought required to sit down and write out my opinion in  matter. That brief silence broke yesterday when I came up with enough material to last a week or two. So keep your eyes open for a post a day this week.

For today’s post we will skip cool science and talk about how a little knowledge can be dangerous. Recently I have met a few people (non-Chinese) who lived in the same city as I did in China. During my conversations with them it struck me how little they knew about the city. Even more revealing was how little knowledge they had about the daily grind of living in China, in some cases their facts being 100% incorrect.

It is conversations such as these which reinforce my belief knowledge needs to be grounded in a background. It is necessary to know the source of the knowledge, opposing views, historical background etc. Otherwise too little knowledge can be easily and readily filterpreted in ways that create misunderstanding. I typically refer to this situation as possessing knowledge with no context.

Akin to a lack of context is when you have some background knowledge and some basic knowledge, but not enough information to make informed decisions. Essentially too little knowledge/information also leads to filterpreting and assumptions, which lead to incorrect understanding and decisions. This is not to say that people do not filterpret when they have all the necessary data, but that is a different situation and has more to do with their individual preconceptions than with a lack of information.

Gender Issues in China

Great amalgamation of some recent articles on gender issues in China here at the China Digital Times. For anyone who is interested in this topic this review of my good friend Professor John Osburg’s book at Tea Leaf Nation adds a lot to this conversation.

One of the key signs that China has reached an inflection pint in their development is the fact that gender equality on all fronts is getting worse, not better. Here are some key examples:

  • Female unemployment in urban areas is rising
  • The gender wage disparity is rising
  • The gender gap is still slowly rising
  • More and more women feel they do not need to work, just find a rich husband
  • It is nearly impossible for a woman to become Mayor, or Party Secretary at any committee level of the CCP
  • While female entrepreneurship is on the rise, there are no female bosses in most companies and industries
  • Rape, stalking and other violent crime against women is steadily increasing

Overall, the reality on the ground for women paints the same picture of China’s choices as do the environment, food safety, and corruption; if China does not act soon to overcome these issues, no one can accurately predict what will happen. What is assured, is the fact that it will not be good for the people of China or the world.


Archives

Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 100 other followers

%d bloggers like this: